Join for updates
Skip to content
IBC Law Reporter
  • Home
  • About Us
  • IBC News
  • Webinars/Seminars
  • Articles/Blogs/Write Ups
  • Resource
  • Contact Us
  • Ebook

Section 53 establishes a clear differentiation in the treatment of payments owed to secured creditors and those owed to the government. This distinction in the law prominently reflects Parliament’s intention to handle government dues separately from the dues of secured creditors-NCLT Kochi

  • Post Author:admin
  • Post published:May 31, 2024

M/s. Rubberwood India Private Limited vs Kerala State Electricity Board Limited & Anr

IA(IBC)/12/KOB/2024 IN CP(IB)/26/KOB/2022

Facts:

1. CIRP was initiated vide order dated 17.05.2022 in CP(IB)/26/KOB/2022, against the Corporate Debtor Rubberwood India Private Limited . Since no resolution plan was received by the Corporate Debtor, by Order dated 15.12.2022 Tribunal passed an order for Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor

2. As per Section 35 of the IBC read with Regulations 32 and 33 of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, the liquidator caused a public notice for the auction of the properties of the Corporate Debtor under Schedule I (5) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulation, 2016 on 12.09.2023 inviting prospective bidders to submit their bid. Reserve price fixed for the assets was Rs. 3,70,00,000/- and the date of the auction was scheduled on 12.10.2023.

3. It is stated that the owner of the property is the Rubber Board, a statutory body incorporated under the Rubber Act of 1947. It is stated that the Applicant qualified to submit the bid under the IB Code and participated in the E-Auction process by depositing an EMD of Rs.37 lakhs. The E-Auction was held on 12.10.2023 and this Applicant emerged as the successful bidder before the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, Respondent No.1 had disconnected the electric supply service to the Corporate Debtor on the grounds of arrears of due. Respondent No.1 has filed its claim against such arrears before the Liquidator To the 1st Respondent, Kerala State Electricity Board Limited, to grant fresh connection to the Applicant without charging any outstanding dues of the Corporate Debtor.

Issue: Whether the Application can be allowed to direct the Respondent to grant fresh connection to the Applicant without charging any outstanding dues of the Corporate Debtor.?

Arguments:

Applicant:

1. Counsel submitted that after taking over the Land and Building, the Applicant approached the KSEB for reconnection/ fresh connection to the said premise in the name of the Applicant on 16.11.2023. However, Respondent No.1 vide letter dated 15.12.2023 refused to grant any connection to the Applicant on the ground of outstanding dues of the Corporate Debtor, Rubber Wood India Pvt Ltd despite filing Claim before the Liquidator. 8. It is stated that once the claim is filed before the Liquidator for past dues and arrears, any payment under the said claim shall be under Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Respondent:

1. Counsel submitted that Applicant is an auction purchaser who stands on a different footing compared to a Successful Resolution Applicant. The terms and conditions of the public auction notice dated 12.09.2023 clearly show that the property is sold on an “as in where is” basis. The existence of an “as in where is “clause in auction agreements warns buyers about pending dues, requiring them to thoroughly investigate the nature of the property.

2. Counsel submitted that Applicant submitted a new application for the electricity connection before the 1st Respondent. However, the same was not considered by the 1st Respondent as the Applicant/Auction Purchaser had not cleared the arrears on the property. It was further submitted that once a Corporate Debtor is admitted into Liquidation, creditors are only entitled to claim under Section 53 of the Code and the assets of the corporate debtor, which are subject to claim shall be free from all encumbrances and charges for the successful purchaser of the property.

Decision: NCLT allowed the application.

Rationale:

1. NCLT held that both secured and unsecured government dues fall under the purview of Section 53 of the Code, forming a distinct and separate class within the legislative framework. It held that the financial loss to the 1st Respondent cannot be a ground to enforce its claim against the Applicant because the IBC is a complete code. 

Order:

Dues_NCLTDownload

Read more articles

Previous PostFiling of a Petition for ‘Oppression and Mismanagement’ under Sections 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013 cannot be considered to be covered by the exceptions provided under Section 250 of the Companies Act,2013-NCLT Bengaluru
Next PostIt is the duty of the RoC to ascertain before issuing Form No. STK – 1 that whether an Investigation or Inspection in respect of the subject Company is pending before any authority or before any forum. ROC cannot mechanically pass order under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 de hors the Rules framed there under-NCLT Chennai
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Latest Posts

  • Distribution of accumulated cash lying in the bank account of the CD to the stakeholders | Section 53 & Regulation 42 of Liquidation Regulations
    August 11, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • Monitoring Committee or the Resolution Applicant is not empowered to file/pursue PUEF/avoidance transactions proceedings | NCLT Delhi | 01.07.2021
    Monitoring Committee or the Resolution Applicant is not empowered to file/pursue PUEF/avoidance transactions proceedings | NCLT Delhi | 01.07.2021
    July 16, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • IBC Law Reporter’s Insights on new changes in CIRP Regulations | 14.07.2021
    IBC Law Reporter’s Insights on new changes in CIRP Regulations | 14.07.2021
    July 15, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • Neither the proceedings for recovery of the dues nor the proceedings for recovery of possession of the allotted premises can be allowed to continue or any proposed action in that regard can be sustained during the currency of the CIRP-NCLT Mumbai
    Neither the proceedings for recovery of the dues nor the proceedings for recovery of possession of the allotted premises can be allowed to continue or any proposed action in that regard can be sustained during the currency of the CIRP-NCLT Mumbai
    July 13, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • Bank Guarantee (BG) can be invoked even after the declaration of moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, 2016- NCLAT
    Bank Guarantee (BG) can be invoked even after the declaration of moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, 2016- NCLAT
    July 10, 2021/
    0 Comments

Follow Us

  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab

Get in Touch

IBC Law Reporter

Phone: +91 83989-94547
Email: support@ibclawreporter.in

www.ibclawreporter.in

Follow Us

  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab

Contact Us





    Quick Links

    Home
    About Us
    Contact Us
    Ebook
    Our Recommendation

    Copyright 2026 - IBC Law Reporter | All Right Reserved
    Close Menu
    • Home
    • About Us
    • IBC News
    • Webinars/Seminars
    • Articles/Blogs/Write Ups
    • Resource
    • Contact Us
    • Ebook