Join for updates
Skip to content

Chapter III Liquidation Process

Section 33. Initiation of liquidation.

(1) Where the Adjudicating Authority, –

  • (a) before the expiry of the insolvency resolution process period or the maximum period permitted for completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process under section 12 or the fast track corporate insolvency resolution process under section 56, as the case may be, does not receive a resolution plan under sub-section (6) of section 30; or
  • (b) rejects the resolution plan under section 31 for the non-compliance of the requirements specified therein, it shall –
    • (i) pass an order requiring the corporate debtor to be liquidated in the manner as laid down in this Chapter;
    • (ii) issue a public announcement stating that the corporate debtor is in liquidation; and
    • (iii) require such order to be sent to the authority with which the corporate debtor is registered.

(2) Where the resolution professional, at any time during the corporate insolvency resolution process but before confirmation of resolution plan, intimates the Adjudicating Authority of the decision of the committee of creditors 1[approved by not less than sixty-six per cent. of the voting share] to liquidate the corporate debtor, the Adjudicating Authority shall pass a liquidation order as referred to in sub-clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of clause (b) of sub-section (1).

2[Explanation. – For the purpose of this sub-section, it is hereby declared that the committee of creditors may take the decision to liquidate the corporate debtor, any time after its constitution under sub-section (1) of section 21 and before the confirmation of the resolution plan, including at any time before the preparation of the information memorandum.]

3) Where the resolution plan approved by the Adjudicating Authority 3[under section 31 or under sub-section (1) of section 54L,] is contravened by the concerned corporate debtor, any person other than the corporate debtor, whose interests are prejudicially affected by such contravention, may make an application to the Adjudicating Authority for a liquidation order as referred to in sub-clauses (i), (ii), (iii) of clause (b) sub-section (1).

(4) On receipt of an application under sub-section (3), if the Adjudicating Authority determines that the corporate debtor has contravened the provisions of the resolution plan, it shall pass a liquidation order as referred to in sub-clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of clause (b) of sub-section (1).

(5) Subject to section 52, when a liquidation order has been passed, no suit or other legal proceeding shall be instituted by or against the corporate debtor:

Provided that a suit or other legal proceeding may be instituted by the liquidator, on behalf of the corporate debtor, with the prior approval of the Adjudicating Authority,

(6) the provisions of sub-section (5) shall not apply to legal proceedings in relation to such transactions as may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with any financial sector regulator.

(7) The order for liquidation under this section shall be deemed to be a notice of discharge to the officers, employees and workmen of the corporate debtor, except when the business of the corporate debtor is continued during the liquidation process by the liquidator.


1. Ins. by Act No. 26 of 2018, sec. 25 (w.e.f. 6-6-2018).
2. Ins. by Act No. 26 of 2019, sec. 8 (w.e.f. 16-8-2019).

3 Ins. by Act No. 26 of 2021, sec. 6 (w.e.f. 04-04-2021).

CASE LAWS

1. Once the application under Section 33 of the ‘I&B Code’ was moved before the Adjudicating Authority, in the given circumstances, it was left with no option but to order the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 14.08.2020 in the matter of Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. vs Shri Shyam Sundar Rathi & Anr. in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 683 of 2020)

2. In the absence of a resolution plan, the Committee of Creditors would have no option but to recommend liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.

The Committee of Creditors may take the decision to liquidate the Corporate Debtor at any time after its constitution and before the confirmation of the Resolution Plan, including at any time prior to preparation of the information memorandum.

After recommending a Resolution Plan for approval of the Adjudicating Authority, the Committee of Creditors can retract it and withdraw the decision in regard to approval of such Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 04.09.2020 in the matter of Dr. Siva Rama Krishna Prasad vs Krishna Industrial Corporation Ltd. & Ors. in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 752 of 2020)

3. There is no illegality in the decision of CoC in liquidating the Corporate Debtor before taking any steps for inviting Expression of Interest for submission of Resolution Plan.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 10.08.2020 in the matter of Sunil S. Kakkad vs Atrium Infocom Private Limited in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 194 of 2020)

4. In the event of liquidation , the amount to be paid to the central and state government should not be less than the amount paid to the operational creditor.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 30.05.2019 in the matter of RMS Employees trust welfare trust Vs. Anil  Goel in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 699 of 2018)

5. Taxes and duties payable to the Government are “crown debt” and can never be treated as “Operational debt” as defined in Section 5(21) of IBC, 2016-Madras High Court

(Reference: Article by the IBC Law Reporter)

6. The dues owed to the State Government and Central Government would come within the definition of ‘operational debt’,

(Reference: Supreme Court Order dated 13.04.2021 in Ghanashym Mishra and Sons Vs. Edelweiss Asset Construction in Civil Appeal No.8129 of 2019) 

7. The CoC has no role to play after the order of liquidation. They are mere claimants, whose matters are to be determined by the Liquidator. They cannot move an application for the removal of the liquidator.

(Reference:  NCLAT Order dated 21.01.2020 in the matter of Punjab National Bank Vs. Kiran Shah Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 102 of 2020)

8. After completion of the CIRP period, ordering liquidation, will not have any bearing on PMLA proceedings.

(Reference: NCLT Chennai Order dated 03.01.2020 in the matter of Nathella Sampath Jewelry Private Limited in MA-1147-2019 & MA-547-2018 in CP-129-IB-CB-2018)

9. The Adjudicating Authority directed the liquidation of the CD without CIRP admission and appointment of IRP. The AA mentioned that there is hardly any possibility of any Resolution Plan likely to be received during the first stage of CIRP if initiated, and thus it would be just and proper to put CD under the Liquidation Process, rather than to put it in CIRP in the first instance.

(Reference: NCLT Bengkuru Order dated 08.11.2019 in the matter of GNB Technologies (India) Private Limited in C.P. (IB)No.167-BB-2019)

10. During the Liquidation Process, it is necessary to take important steps for revival and continuance of the CD, during the liquidation process, by protecting it from its management and from a death by liquidation.

The NCLAT directed the Liquidator to first take steps for compromise or arrangement with the creditors, or class of creditors or members or class of members in terms of Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013.

On failure, the liquidator is required to take step to sell the business of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ as going concern in its totality along with the employees.

The Adjudicating Authority should follow the same principle and should allow the ‘Liquidator’ to constitute a ‘Committee of Creditors’ for its opinion to find out whether the arrangement of Scheme is viable, feasible and having appropriate financial matrix.

(Reference: NCLAT order dated 27.02.2019 in the matter of Y. Shivram Prasad Vs.  S. Dhanpal & Ors. in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 224 of 2018)

Read more articles

Previous PostSection 32A
Next PostSection 34
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
Copyright 2026 - IBC Law Reporter | All Right Reserved
Close Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
  • IBC News
  • Webinars/Seminars
  • Articles/Blogs/Write Ups
  • Resource
  • Contact Us
  • Ebook