Join for updates
Skip to content

Chapter II Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Section 8. Insolvency resolution by operational creditor.

(1) An operational creditor may, on the occurrence of a default, deliver a demand notice of unpaid operational debtor copy of an invoice demanding payment of the amount involved in the default to the corporate debtor in such form and manner as may be prescribed.

(2) The corporate debtor shall, within a period of ten days of the receipt of the demand notice or copy of the invoice mentioned in sub-section (1) bring to the notice of the operational creditor –

  • (a) existence of a dispute, 1[if any, or] record of the pendency of the suit or arbitration proceedings filed before the receipt of such notice or invoice in relation to such dispute;
  • (b) the 2[payment] of unpaid operational debt-
    • (i) by sending an attested copy of the record of electronic transfer of the unpaid amount from the bank account of the corporate debtor; or
    • (ii) by sending an attested copy of record that the operational creditor has encashed a cheque issued by the corporate debtor.

Explanation. – For the purposes of this section, a “demand notice” means a notice served by an operational creditor to the corporate debtor demanding 3[payment] of the operational debt in respect of which the default has occurred.


1. Subs. by Act No. 26 of 2018, sec.5 (a) (i) for the words “if any, and” (w.e.f. 6-6-2018).
2. Subs by Act No. 26 of 2018, sec.5 (a) (ii) for the word “repayment” (w.e.f. 6-6-2018).
3. Subs. by Act No. 26 of 2018, sec.5 (b) for the word “repayment” (w.e.f. 6-6-2018).

CASE LAWS

1. Dispute to be raised at the time of statutory notice, not at the time when the application is made u/s 9 of the code.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 20.08.2020 in Gaurang Nipinbhai Nagarsheth vs POSCO -India Pune Processing Center Pvt Ltd & Anr.  Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency)  No. 214 of 2020)

2. A dispute must truly exist in facts & should not be spurious, hypothetical & illusory.  

(Reference: SC Order dated 20.07.2020 in Vishal Vijay Kalantri vs. DBM Geotechnics & Constructions Pvt. Ltd & Anr. Civil Appeal No.2730 of 2020)

3. Expression existence of a dispute, if any, is broad & not limited to instances specified in the definition u/s 5(6), it has far arms.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 04.09.2020 in Kuntal Construction Pvt Ltd vs Bharat Hotels Ltd. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.542 of 2020)

4. Prior notice u/s 8 is mandatory before making an application u/s 9 of the code.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 25.05.2017 Seema_Gupta vs Supreme Infrastructure India Ltd & ors Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.53 of 2017)

5. OC cannot use the code prematurely or for extraneous considerations or as a substitute for debt enforcement mechanisms.

(Reference: SC Order dated 14.08.2018 in the matter of K. Kishan Vs. Vijay Nirman Company Pvt. Ltd. Civil Appeal Nos. 21824 & 21825 of 2017)

6. Legislative intent of issuance of notice u/s 8 is not a mere formality but mandatory.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 11.07.2018 in the matter of Prajna Praksh Nayak Vs. ASAP Info Systems Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 196 of 2018)

7. Dispute u/s 18 of the MSME Act takes color from section 17 thereof and is different from the dispute u/s 5(6) of the code read with section 8 of the Code.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 13.01.2020 in the matter of iValue Advisors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Srinagar Banihal Expressway Ltd. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1142 of 2019)

8. Corporate Debtor can show and satisfy the AA that default has not occurred in the sense that the debt, which may also include a disputed claim, is not due or payable in law or fact.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 30.11.2018 in the matter of Neha Himatsingka & Anr Vs. Himatsingka Resorts Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.201 and another appeal)

9. Pendency of proceeding  u/s 138/141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 cannot be held to be a dispute pending before a court, such pendency actually amounts to an admission of debt and not the existence of a dispute.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 13.11.2018 in the matter of Sudhi Sachdev Vs. APPL Industries Ltd. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 623 of 2018)

10. Pendency of appeal u/s 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 falls within the definition of existence of the dispute.

(Reference: NCLT Order dated 16.02.2018 in the matter of CG Power & Industrial Solutions Ltd. Vs. ACC Ltd. (CP) No. 1681/1B & C/2017)

Read more articles

Previous PostSection 7
Next PostSection 9
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
Copyright 2025 - IBC Law Reporter | All Right Reserved
Close Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
  • IBC News
  • Webinars/Seminars
  • Articles/Blogs/Write Ups
  • Resource
  • Contact Us
  • Ebook