Join for updates
Skip to content
IBC Law Reporter
  • Home
  • About Us
  • IBC News
  • Webinars/Seminars
  • Articles/Blogs/Write Ups
  • Resource
  • Contact Us
  • Ebook

AA is not having power to condone delay beyond15 days-NCLAT

  • Post Author:admin
  • Post published:August 26, 2022

           Chhote Lal Gupta, Proprietor, Tirupati EnterprisesVs. Jai Balaji Jyoti Steels Ltd

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.955 of 2022

Facts:

1.Appellant is challenging the order passed by the Cuttack Bench of NCLT which dismissed the application of the appellant.Order was passed on 13th may 2022 and appeal was filed on 8th July 2022.

Issue:

Whether AA is having power to condone delay beyond 15 days?

Arguments:

For appellant:

1.Counsel  relying on a Judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in (2022) 2 SCC 244 “V. Nagarajan Vs. S.K.S. Ispat and Power Ltd.”  submitted that Appeal is within time.

2.He further submitted that certified copy was applied on 08th June, 2022 i.e. within 30 days from the date of the Impugned Order which was made available on 09th June, 2022 hence thereafter the Appellant will have 30 days’ time to file this Appeal and having been filed on 08th July, 2022 is within time.Further relying on Judgement of ‘V. Nagarajan”  submits that from the date of the certified copy of the Order was made available he had at least 45 days to file the Appeal.

Decision: AA is not having power to condone delay beyond 15 days.

Rationale:

1.Under Section 61 (2) of the Code, the period provided for filing the Appeal is 30 days from the date of Order. The Appellant is entitled to exclude the period for which certified copy was under preparation. Certified Copy was applied on 08th June, 2022 and delivered on 09th June, 2022 hence two days period is entitled to be excluded in computing the limitation. 13th May, 2022 was the date on which Order was passed by the Adjudicating Authority hence Appellant has time to file the Appeal till 12th June, 2022 and further he is entitled for extension of two days limitation i.e. up 14th June, 2022 and this Tribunal has power to condone the delay of only 15 days, the delay in the present Appeal is more than 15 days hence we are unable to condone the delay.

Order Copy:

Chote-Lal-gupta-vs-Jai-BalajiDownload

Read more articles

Previous PostMobilization advance falls within the ambit of operational debt-NCLAT
Next PostInsufficiently stamped redeemable Non-Convertible Debentures Subscription  Agreement and the Debenture Trust Deed can be relied upon as valid legal documents while  considering an application filed under Section 7 of the IBC -NCLAT
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Latest Posts

  • Distribution of accumulated cash lying in the bank account of the CD to the stakeholders | Section 53 & Regulation 42 of Liquidation Regulations
    August 11, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • Monitoring Committee or the Resolution Applicant is not empowered to file/pursue PUEF/avoidance transactions proceedings | NCLT Delhi | 01.07.2021
    Monitoring Committee or the Resolution Applicant is not empowered to file/pursue PUEF/avoidance transactions proceedings | NCLT Delhi | 01.07.2021
    July 16, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • IBC Law Reporter’s Insights on new changes in CIRP Regulations | 14.07.2021
    IBC Law Reporter’s Insights on new changes in CIRP Regulations | 14.07.2021
    July 15, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • Neither the proceedings for recovery of the dues nor the proceedings for recovery of possession of the allotted premises can be allowed to continue or any proposed action in that regard can be sustained during the currency of the CIRP-NCLT Mumbai
    Neither the proceedings for recovery of the dues nor the proceedings for recovery of possession of the allotted premises can be allowed to continue or any proposed action in that regard can be sustained during the currency of the CIRP-NCLT Mumbai
    July 13, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • Bank Guarantee (BG) can be invoked even after the declaration of moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, 2016- NCLAT
    Bank Guarantee (BG) can be invoked even after the declaration of moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, 2016- NCLAT
    July 10, 2021/
    0 Comments

Follow Us

  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab

Get in Touch

IBC Law Reporter

Phone: +91 83989-94547
Email: support@ibclawreporter.in

www.ibclawreporter.in

Follow Us

  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab

Contact Us





    Quick Links

    Home
    About Us
    Contact Us
    Ebook
    Our Recommendation

    Copyright 2025 - IBC Law Reporter | All Right Reserved
    Close Menu
    • Home
    • About Us
    • IBC News
    • Webinars/Seminars
    • Articles/Blogs/Write Ups
    • Resource
    • Contact Us
    • Ebook