Join for updates
Skip to content
IBC Law Reporter
  • Home
  • About Us
  • IBC News
  • Webinars/Seminars
  • Articles/Blogs/Write Ups
  • Resource
  • Contact Us
  • Ebook

IBBI Discussion Paper dated 09.06.2022 on Remuneration of an Insolvency Professional

  • Post Author:admin
  • Post published:June 9, 2022

This paper deals with the issue of fee of an insolvency professional (IP) acting as an interim resolution professional (IRP)/ resolution professional (RP) in the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) who has a significant role in ensuring the timely completion of the CIRP in addition to the indispensable role played by each stakeholder including the Adjudicating Authority (AA), the committee of creditors (CoC), resolution applicants, etc. To this end, the paper suggests changes to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (CIRP Regulations).

The gist of the proposed changes is as under:

1. #Fixed Fee Structure

Minimum per month fees payable to the IP are dependent upon the quantum of claims admitted as per the table below.

For example:

a) In case, the claims admitted is less than or equal to Rs. 50 crore, then the minimum per month fees payable to the IP will be Rs. 1.50 Lakh and

b) In case, the claims admitted is more than Rs. 10,000 Crore, then the minimum per month fees payable to the IP will be Rs. 7.50 Lakh.

2. #Performance-linked fee structure for timely resolution

The resolution professional may be paid performance-linked fee for ensuring timely completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process as per the table below:

Note A: It will cover the period from the commencement of the corporate insolvency resolution process and appointment of an interim resolution professional under section 16(1) of the Code till the submission of resolution plan approved by the committee to the Adjudicating Authority under regulation 39(4).

Note B: The above fee is subject to a maximum amount not exceeding Rs.5 crore, and actual payment is to be made only upon approval of the resolution plan by AA [u/s 31(1) of the Code.

3. #Performance-linked fee structure relating to Value Maximization

The resolution professional may be paid performance linked fee calculated at the rate of 1% of the positive difference between the actual realisable value and fair value subject to a maximum amount not exceeding Rs.5 crore, for ensuring value maximisation of the assets of the corporate debtor. The committee may devise any other incentive structure, or it may decide not to give such an incentive.

4. #Escrow Account Mechanism

IP shall in the first meeting of CoC give estimate of fixed fee and expenditure on hiring of other professionals / support service etc. to the CoC. For the said estimate of fees and expenses pertaining to the first six months period, CoC shall either contribute to an escrow account or obtain the interim finance, towards the same.

IBBI-DP-dated-09.06.2022-on-Remuneration-of-an-IPDownload

Read more articles

Previous PostSOP dated 23.05.2022 issued by Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs in respect of IBC cases
Next PostProvisional List of IPs issued by the IBBI (July 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022)
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Latest Posts

  • Distribution of accumulated cash lying in the bank account of the CD to the stakeholders | Section 53 & Regulation 42 of Liquidation Regulations
    August 11, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • Monitoring Committee or the Resolution Applicant is not empowered to file/pursue PUEF/avoidance transactions proceedings | NCLT Delhi | 01.07.2021
    Monitoring Committee or the Resolution Applicant is not empowered to file/pursue PUEF/avoidance transactions proceedings | NCLT Delhi | 01.07.2021
    July 16, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • IBC Law Reporter’s Insights on new changes in CIRP Regulations | 14.07.2021
    IBC Law Reporter’s Insights on new changes in CIRP Regulations | 14.07.2021
    July 15, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • Neither the proceedings for recovery of the dues nor the proceedings for recovery of possession of the allotted premises can be allowed to continue or any proposed action in that regard can be sustained during the currency of the CIRP-NCLT Mumbai
    Neither the proceedings for recovery of the dues nor the proceedings for recovery of possession of the allotted premises can be allowed to continue or any proposed action in that regard can be sustained during the currency of the CIRP-NCLT Mumbai
    July 13, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • Bank Guarantee (BG) can be invoked even after the declaration of moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, 2016- NCLAT
    Bank Guarantee (BG) can be invoked even after the declaration of moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, 2016- NCLAT
    July 10, 2021/
    0 Comments

Follow Us

  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab

Get in Touch

IBC Law Reporter

Phone: +91 83989-94547
Email: support@ibclawreporter.in

www.ibclawreporter.in

Follow Us

  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab

Contact Us





    Quick Links

    Home
    About Us
    Contact Us
    Ebook
    Our Recommendation

    Copyright 2025 - IBC Law Reporter | All Right Reserved
    Close Menu
    • Home
    • About Us
    • IBC News
    • Webinars/Seminars
    • Articles/Blogs/Write Ups
    • Resource
    • Contact Us
    • Ebook