Join for updates
Skip to content

Chapter II Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Section 9. Application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by operational creditor. –

(1) After the expiry of the period of ten days from the date of delivery of the notice or invoice demanding payment under sub-section (1) of section 8, if the operational creditor does not receive payment from the corporate debtor or notice of the dispute under sub-section (2) of section 8, the operational creditor may file an application before the Adjudicating Authority for initiating a corporate insolvency resolution process.

(2) The application under sub-section (1) shall be filed in such form and manner and accompanied with such fee as may be prescribed.

(3) The operational creditor shall, along with the application furnish-

  • (a) a copy of the invoice demanding payment or demand notice delivered by the operational creditor to the corporate debtor;
  • (b) an affidavit to the effect that there is no notice given by the corporate debtor relating to a dispute of the unpaid operational debt;
  • (c) a copy of the certificate from the financial institutions maintaining accounts of the operational creditor confirming that there is no payment of an unpaid operational debt 1[by the corporate debtor, if available;]
  • 2[(d) a copy of any record with information utility confirming that there is no payment of an unpaid operational debt by the corporate debtor, if available; and
  • (e) any other proof confirming that there is no payment of any unpaid operational debt by the corporate debtor or such other information, as may be prescribed.]

(4) An operational creditor initiating a corporate insolvency resolution process under this section, may propose a resolution professional to act as an interim resolution professional.

(5) The Adjudicating Authority shall, within fourteen days of the receipt of the application under sub-section (2), by an order–

  • (i) admit the application and communicate such decision to the operational creditor and the corporate debtor if, –
    • (a) the application made under sub-section (2) is complete;
    • (b) there is no 3[payment] of the unpaid operational debt;
    • (c) the invoice or notice for payment to the corporate debtor has been delivered by the operational creditor;
    • (d) no notice of dispute has been received by the operational creditor or there is no record of dispute in the information utility; and
    • (e) there is no disciplinary proceeding pending against any resolution professional proposed under sub-section (4), if any.
  • (ii) reject the application and communicate such decision to the operational creditor and the corporate debtor, if –
    • (a) the application made under sub-section (2) is incomplete;
    • (b) there has been 4[payment] of the unpaid operational debt;
    • (c) the creditor has not delivered the invoice or notice for payment to the corporate debtor;
    • (d) notice of dispute has been received by the operational creditor or there is a record of dispute in the information utility; or
    • (e) any disciplinary proceeding is pending against any proposed resolution professional:

Provided that Adjudicating Authority, shall before rejecting an application under sub-clause (a) of clause (ii) give a notice to the applicant to rectify the defect in his application within seven days of the date of receipt of such notice from the Adjudicating Authority.

(6) The corporate insolvency resolution process shall commence from the date of admission of the application under sub-section (5) of this section.


1. Subs. by Act No. 26 of 2018, sec. 6 (a) (i), for the words” by the corporate debtor; and” (w.e.f. 6-6-2018).
2. Subs. by Act No. 26 of 2018, sec. 6 (a) (ii), for the words “such other information or as may be specified” (w.e.f. 6-6-2018).
3. Subs. by Act No. 26 of 2018, sec. 6 (b) (A) for the word “repayment” (w.e.f. 6-6-2018).
4. Subs. by Act No. 26 of 2018, sec. 6 (b) (B) for the word “repayment” (w.e.f. 6-6-2018).

CASE LAWS

1. Advance payment for supply of goods not operational debt even if goods were not supplied.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 22.04.2019 in the matter of Roma Infrastructure India Pvt. Ltd.  Vs. A.S. Iron Steel (I) Pvt. Ltd. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.223 of 2019)

2. Application u/s 9 of the code is not maintainable against partnership firm even if one or more partner of the firm is a corporate debtor.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 19.12.2018 in the matter of Gammon India Ltd. Vs. Neelkanth Mansions & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.  Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.698 of 2018)

3. Provisions of the Tea Act, 1953 & provisions under IBC, 2016 occupy different fields, no permission is required of the Central Govt. for initiating CIRP proceedings.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 20.06.2019 in the matter of A.J. Agrochem Vs. Duncans Industries Ltd. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.710 of 2018)

4. Application u/s 9 once admitted cannot be permitted to withdrawn as other creditors are entitled are permitted to raise claims pursuant to the public announcement

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 13.07.2017 in the matter of Mother Pride Dairy India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Portrait Advertising & Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 94 of 2017)

5. Copy of certificate from the financial condition u/s 9(3) maintaining accounts of the OC confirming that there is no payment is not a condition precedent to triggering of CIRP.

(Reference: SC Order dated 15.12.2017 in the matter of Macquarie Bank Ltd. Vs. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd. Civil Appeal No.15135 of 2017 & other appeals)

6. Unless the decree of a foreign court & decretal amount is adjudicated by a civil court as a legally payable claim, the same would not constitute a debt and unless the debt is crystallized and payable in law, the issue of default would not be attracted.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 03.07.2019 in the matter of Peter Johnson John (Employee) Vs. KEC International Ltd. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 188 of 2019.)

7. No other party has the right to intervene at the stage of an application under sec 7 and 9 of the code except the corporate debtor.

(Reference: NCLAT Order dated 24.04.2019 in the matter of Damont Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bank of Baroda & Anr. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 436-437 of 2019.)

Read more articles

Previous PostSection 8
Next PostSection 10
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
Copyright 2026 - IBC Law Reporter | All Right Reserved
Close Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
  • IBC News
  • Webinars/Seminars
  • Articles/Blogs/Write Ups
  • Resource
  • Contact Us
  • Ebook