Join for updates
Skip to content
IBC Law Reporter
  • Home
  • About Us
  • IBC News
  • Webinars/Seminars
  • Articles/Blogs/Write Ups
  • Resource
  • Contact Us
  • Ebook

Exclusion of 147 days due to non cooperation by suspended directors-NCLT New Delhi

  • Post Author:admin
  • Post published:October 10, 2022

In the matter of deepak Kumar Garg (Resolution Professional of panoptes India Private Limited)

IA/2417/ND/2022

Facts:

1.CIRP was initiated against the  PANOPTES India private limited vide order dated 30.11.2021 and applicant was appointed as the IRP and later as the RP.

2.Applicant appearing in person submitted that after receiving the order immediately took all steps to take charge of the corporate debtor and visited the site of the registered office of the corporate debtor at the address available at the MCA wherein it was found that no such company exist. Applicant visited another address available of the corporate debtor and and it was discovered that no such office exist and it was vacated around 12-13 months ago.

3.Applicant contacted suspended director and employee of the corporate debtor for taking possession of the books of accounts, inventory and wherabout of the corporate debtor to prepare the IM and to run the debtor. Applicant vide email requested for details like Income tax login ID passwords, status of cash flow, bank account details, location of fixed assets, and books of accounts.

4.No such was information was received and applicant filed application under section 19(2) of the Code for non-cooperation by suspended management. Applicant at its own efforts managed to get in contact with the statutory auditor when he git to know about that statutory auditor was not able to conduct the audit.

5.Applicant submitted that non availability of the information from the suspended director restrained the applicant to carry out his duty to prepare IM and functions during the period of 147 days. Applicant informed the COC about circumstances in hand and asked for passing resolution for the exclusion of this 147 days.

Prayer: Whether the period of 147 days can be excluded from the period of CIRP?

Decision: Prayer: The period of 147 days can be excluded from the period of CIRP

Rationale:

1.Tribunal noted that applicant could not perform function because of the non-cooperation of the promoters of the corporate debtor. Whereabouts of the corporate debtor was also not known as the registered office was dummy.

2.Applicant made all endevaours for performing his duties as the RP and the applicant is in the position to run the corporate debtor and prepare IM, inviting EOI after receiving documents from statutory auditor

Order:

In-the-matter-of-Deepak-Kumar-Garg_NCLT_Panoptes-IndiaDownload

Read more articles

Previous PostGist of 5 recent changes introduced by the IBBI in the month of September 2022 I IBBI (Insolvency Professionals)Regulations 2016
Next PostARC’s can act as a Resolution Applicant under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 vide RBI notification No-RBI/2022-23/128 dated 11th October 2022
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
  • Opens in a new window
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Latest Posts

  • Distribution of accumulated cash lying in the bank account of the CD to the stakeholders | Section 53 & Regulation 42 of Liquidation Regulations
    August 11, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • Monitoring Committee or the Resolution Applicant is not empowered to file/pursue PUEF/avoidance transactions proceedings | NCLT Delhi | 01.07.2021
    Monitoring Committee or the Resolution Applicant is not empowered to file/pursue PUEF/avoidance transactions proceedings | NCLT Delhi | 01.07.2021
    July 16, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • IBC Law Reporter’s Insights on new changes in CIRP Regulations | 14.07.2021
    IBC Law Reporter’s Insights on new changes in CIRP Regulations | 14.07.2021
    July 15, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • Neither the proceedings for recovery of the dues nor the proceedings for recovery of possession of the allotted premises can be allowed to continue or any proposed action in that regard can be sustained during the currency of the CIRP-NCLT Mumbai
    Neither the proceedings for recovery of the dues nor the proceedings for recovery of possession of the allotted premises can be allowed to continue or any proposed action in that regard can be sustained during the currency of the CIRP-NCLT Mumbai
    July 13, 2021/
    0 Comments
  • Bank Guarantee (BG) can be invoked even after the declaration of moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, 2016- NCLAT
    Bank Guarantee (BG) can be invoked even after the declaration of moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, 2016- NCLAT
    July 10, 2021/
    0 Comments

Follow Us

  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab

Get in Touch

IBC Law Reporter

Phone: +91 83989-94547
Email: support@ibclawreporter.in

www.ibclawreporter.in

Follow Us

  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab

Contact Us





    Quick Links

    Home
    About Us
    Contact Us
    Ebook
    Our Recommendation

    Copyright 2025 - IBC Law Reporter | All Right Reserved
    Close Menu
    • Home
    • About Us
    • IBC News
    • Webinars/Seminars
    • Articles/Blogs/Write Ups
    • Resource
    • Contact Us
    • Ebook